differente results in the alu can vs pet bottle" case study
Posted: 13 Aug 2013 16:10
Hi,
I'm following the tutorial about beer bottle case study. I've followed all the instructions until chapter 3 and I obtained some different results from the ones specified in the tutorial.
1. chapter 3.4, build the ALU can model: openLCA did automatically the correction about the aluminum secondary and aluminum recycling...I checked the graph and it's exactly how it should be as described in the tutorial. Maybe an improvement related to 1.3 version??
2. When it comes to comparison of the two product systems, the results are very different and the ALU can system has significantly higher impacts than PET bottel. That is the opposite result of the tutorial. You can see in the image below .
I repeated the exercise twice and I always obtained this result.
I would like to understand if I did something wrong...do you have any idea?
Thanks a lot,
Sara
I'm following the tutorial about beer bottle case study. I've followed all the instructions until chapter 3 and I obtained some different results from the ones specified in the tutorial.
1. chapter 3.4, build the ALU can model: openLCA did automatically the correction about the aluminum secondary and aluminum recycling...I checked the graph and it's exactly how it should be as described in the tutorial. Maybe an improvement related to 1.3 version??
2. When it comes to comparison of the two product systems, the results are very different and the ALU can system has significantly higher impacts than PET bottel. That is the opposite result of the tutorial. You can see in the image below .
I repeated the exercise twice and I always obtained this result.
I would like to understand if I did something wrong...do you have any idea?
Thanks a lot,
Sara